Truth is Good for the World
179 killed at Pentagon on 9/11 (125 in the Pentagon and 54 on the alleged plane)
Possible Motive:On the day before 9/11
“$2,300,000,000,000 Missing” Donald Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense declared on national TV, that’s $8,000 for every man, women, and child in the USA
Next day, 9/11th
At 8:46 AM, hole in Tower 1 Hit by flight 11
At 9:03 AM, hole in Tower 2 Hit by flight 175
At 9:37 AM, Pentagon hit – but by what ?
Truth is Good for the World
possible weapons
Boeing 757?
Missile?
Truth is Good for the World
Entry/exit wounds
Approximate trajectory through the Pentagon
Exit hole of projectile
Truth is Good for the World
round hole, square peg
Pentagon shortly after alleged 757 strike
Truth is Good for the World
The Pentagon’s west wing’s E-ring stood for 30 minutes.
Even after collapse does a 757 fit?
Where is the damaged that should have been made by the wings?
Truth is Good for the World
does a missile fit?
A missile could have entered here without breaking all the windows and walls
A missile could have flown over the grass, still leaving it in pristine condition, as shown after facade collapse. But an aeroplanes debris would be everywhere.
Truth is Good for the World
round hole, square peg – look at the damage
Missile damage. Or plane damage?
Make your own
judgment
call.
Truth is Good for the World
missing & dubious evidence
In March 2002, 5 frames of video surveillance were released. All frames are displayed to the left and none of them show any signs of a 757 in them.
There are numerous cameras on and around the Pentagon that would have captured a 757 aircraft approaching, as so should have the video confiscated from neighbouring buildings by FBI agents.
Truth is good for the World
round hole, square peg – fireball + Id
Alleged fireballs in frames 2..5. The student ID of alleged hijacker
shown to be intense enough Hani Hanjour ‘found’ in a
to incinerate passports. recognisable condition.
Consider too that frames 2..5
could be faked, hence the
pristine grass show
earlier.
Truth is Good for the World
round hole, square peg – cockpits
Hani Hanjour had only trained Can you see a problem here?
on a single engined Cessna.
Murder Investigation
round hole, square peg – flight paths
The official story’s flight path taken Why would an Islamic suicide pilot
by the alleged 757 and flown pass up a more direct approach
by an amateur pilot. to crash into the pentagon?
Truth is Good for the World
made your mind up?
These sites have:
More than 9/11 Truth from Wellington, NZ 
Nice lay out …for a curious mind …it makes you wonder …for a curious mind.
Cheers. With COVID there is something new to be curious about
Re the Pentagon I agree with Barbara Honegger’s advice, that in her opinion, the evidence is simply not there that a 757 plane hit the pentagon”. However, her important message is “that if we want a consensus approach in the 9/11 truth movement going forward, there is overwhelming evidence that there were explosions from inside the Pentagon on 9/11 before the alleged plane hit the pentagon 6 minutes earlier. Therefore, you don’t need to address the controversy of whether a plane hit the pentagon or not.” More information here….
http://nz911truth.org/news/barbara-honegger-eyewitnesses-and-evidence-of-explosions-at-the-pentagon/
Barbara Honegger’s does go onto say in her video, 33:38 “in my opinion the evidence is simply not there that a 757 of any kind hit the Pentagon, in my opinion”.
There is truth, and there is deeper truth. It is enough to know that the international news media has coordinated a lie about 9/11 and is not calling for a murder inquiry to be launched into the mass murders of 9/11. People go through a journey, and the start of that journey is the most important. 1st from picture evidence they can deduce for themselves that no 757 hit. Then if they take it further, they can find out about the per-explostions and the deeper evidence given by witness, which I sincerely hope that they take the time an effort to do so.
If a missile hit the Pentagon instead of a 757 loaded with fuel, where did the ball of flames come from at impact? Do missiles carry fuel that would cause such a fireball?
I note how you accurately observe a “ball of flames”. Two aeroplane wings of fuel flung headlong into a wall would not produce that nice evenly expanding single “ball of flames” you mention. You can observe how the planes hitting the 911 towers did not produce “balls of flames” but irregular cauliflowers of fire.
Although missiles only have relatively small fuel tanks, they do carry explosives. The fireballs they produce are quite ball like in shape.
Thank you for your observation.
Good question. What is real, what is unreal. There were no semi-hemispherical balls of flame in either of the two twin tower impacts. What is going on?